August 15, 2026 04:13 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe | From guns to glamour: Former women Maoists walk the ramp in Chhattisgarh | Netaji row: Suvendu Adhikari govt strips BJP MP Anant Maharaj of state honour | Sukhbir Badal attacked by Nihang Sikh with kirpan at Maharashtra gurdwara; assailant detained | ‘If you cannot do it, we will pass an order’: Supreme Court’s final warning to Centre on food labels | ‘Time to move on’: Bombay HC sends strong message in Vijay Mallya-bank dispute
Sugar
Photo Courtesy: Pixabay

Low-sugar diet in early childhood can reduce lifetime risk of chronic disease like diabetes, reveals study

| @indiablooms | Nov 06, 2024, at 03:11 pm

A low-sugar diet in the first years of life can significantly reduce the risk of chronic diseases in adulthood, a study based on historical data has found.

The researchers pulled data from UK Biobank, focusing on adults conceived just before and after the 1953 end of wartime sugar rationing in the United Kingdom.

The study, published in Science, indicated that children exposed to sugar restrictions during their first 1,000 days, including pregnancy in utero, had up to a 35-per-cent-lower risk of developing Type 2 diabetes and up to 20-per-cent-lower risk of hypertension as adults. Surprisingly to the researchers, in-utero exposure alone was enough to lower risks.

The study – led by the University of Southern California in collaboration with the University of California Berkeley and McGill – provides some of the first compelling human evidence of the lifelong effects of early sugar intake.

Yesterday’s ration, today’s guideline

While rationing was in effect during the Second World War and several years afterward, sugar intake was less than 40 grams per day for adults and none for children under two. When rationing ended, consumption skyrocketed. The stark contrast gave researchers a clear snapshot of sugar’s effects.

“What’s fascinating is that sugar levels allowed during rationing mirror today’s guidelines. Our study suggests that if parents followed these recommendations, it could lead to significant health benefits for their children," said co-author of the study, Claire Boone, Assistant Professor in McGill’s Department of Economics and the Department of Equity, Ethics, and Policy.

Health Canada recommends little to no added sugars for children under two. There are strict limits on sodium and food additives for infants, but there are no regulations on sugars.

‘Natural experiment’ shows long-term effects

Boone said studying nutrition is notoriously difficult because it’s hard to control diets over long periods of time and track outcomes accurately.

“That’s why there is so much conflicting dietary research out there,” she said.

“This natural experiment allows us to see the long-term effects of sugar intake in a real-world setting, providing the public with a much clearer picture.”

She noted that as public debates continue about measures like sugar taxes and tougher regulations on sugary foods marketed to infants and toddlers, the study’s findings add to mounting evidence showing how important early diet is for lifelong health.

Boone added that the next phase of research will explore how sugar early in life could affect inflammation and cancer risk.

The study was supported by the U.S. National Institute on Aging.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.