February 03, 2026 11:30 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After Budget mayhem, bulls return: Sensex, Nifty stage sharp recovery | Dalai Lama wins first Grammy at 90 | Firing outside Rohit Shetty’s Mumbai home: 4 arrested, Bishnoi Gang link emerges | Female suicide attackers emerge at centre of deadly BLA assaults that rocked Pakistan’s Balochistan | Delhi blast: Probe reveals doctors' module planned attacks on global coffee chain | Begging bowl: Pakistan PM says he feels “ashamed” seeking loans abroad | Epstein Files shocker! Zohran Mamdani’s mother Mira Nair mentioned in latest tranche | Bill Gates contracted STD after sex with Russian women? Epstein Files make explosive, unverified claims | Big setback for Modi govt: Supreme Court stays controversial UGC Equity Regulations 2026 amid student protests | ‘Mother of all deals’: PM Modi says India–EU FTA is for 'ambitious India'

Mumbai High Court questions blanket ban on Maggi noodles

| | Jul 23, 2015, at 09:54 pm
Mumbai, Jul 23 (IBNS) The Bombay High on Thursday questioned the propriety of the blanket ban on Maggi noodles.

The Court asked the government why the entire product was banned if just one batch was found to be bad, reports said. 

The court also  questioned why a showcause notice was not issued before imposing the ban on the product of Nestle India.

The High Court's observation came a day after the Food Safety Standards Association of India (FSSAI) argued that a mere suspicion about a food snack being sub-standard justifies the order to stop sale of the product.

The court was hearing a petition filed by Nestle India against the ban on Maggi. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.