NGT renders forest clearance to Mahan Coal invalid after SC verdict

The NGT’s decision has injected a new vigour in the forest dwellers who have been opposing the project for the last three years. To celebrate the landmark verdict, thousands of villagers in the region came together in a rally, vowed that they would not let the Mahan forests that they depend on fall into the clutches of coal mining again, Greenpeace said in a statement.

 

The NGT’s decision was in response to a petition filed by members of Mahan Sangharsh Samiti (MSS) which challenged the coal mine’s forest clearance. 

 

The project would have led to the loss of approximately 5 lakh trees and affected the livelihoods of over 50,000 people in 54 villages, it said.

 

“We welcome the NGT’s view on the forest clearance. Battling threats, illegal arrests and midnight police raids, we have come a long way. We know this might only be a temporary win, but our struggle will continue and we will oppose any future attempts to hand over these forests for mining,” said Kripanath Yadav, resident of Amelia village and a member of MSS.

 

“Mahan is a perfect example of the growing opposition from communities to mining projects that destroy their forests. Companies would be foolhardy to risk their money bidding for a forested coal block where opposition to mining will be intense. This is also a vindication of the work Greenpeace has been doing – the ‘leaked IB report faulted us for demanding the forest rights of communities in Mahan, but the courts have shown that we were on the side of justice,” said Priya Pillai, member of MSS and senior campaigner with Greenpeace India. 

 

The government has said it will move fast to auction the cancelled blocks. 

 

MSS and Greenpeace India demanded that the government should revise the criteria for allocation of coal mines to exclude forest areas like Mahan.

 

MSS and Greenpeace have highlighted the shoddy implementation of the Forest Rights Act in the region. While there are 54 villages dependant on the Mahan forests, community consent was sought from just one village – Amelia. The Gram Sabha resolution showing community consent was forged, with at least nine of the signatories having been deceased at that time of the meeting.

 

Under the Forest Rights Act, community forest rights must be recognized before consent is sought for any mining or infrastructure project, Greenpeace claimed.

 

“Communities in five villages in the Mahan forest area have now filed community forest rights claims.  However, their rights have not yet been recognised. The local administration has failed miserably in the implementation of FRA,” said Pillai.