August 15, 2026 12:40 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe | From guns to glamour: Former women Maoists walk the ramp in Chhattisgarh | Netaji row: Suvendu Adhikari govt strips BJP MP Anant Maharaj of state honour | Sukhbir Badal attacked by Nihang Sikh with kirpan at Maharashtra gurdwara; assailant detained | ‘If you cannot do it, we will pass an order’: Supreme Court’s final warning to Centre on food labels | ‘Time to move on’: Bombay HC sends strong message in Vijay Mallya-bank dispute

Reducing hospital readmissions does not increase mortality rates, says study

| | Jul 22, 2017, at 01:26 am
London, July 21 (IBNS): Recent advances in reducing hospital readmission rates for three key medical conditions occurred without causing an increase in death rates, according to a new Yale study.

The findings were published on July 18 in JAMA.

Hospitals nationwide have made significant reductions in rates of readmission 30 days after a patient’s discharge in response to rules established by the Affordable Care Act. The health reform law imposed financial penalties for hospitals with high readmission rates for common medical conditions, including heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia. However, questions rose about whether efforts to keep patients out of the hospital would negatively impact mortality rates.

To examine the issue, the Yale research team, who developed the readmission measures, studied data on Medicare recipients hospitalized for heart attack, heart failure, or pneumonia between 2008 and 2014. They analyzed trends for readmissions and mortality at individual hospitals over time to determine whether there was a link between the two factors. The team reviewed the data for different time periods within the study period, and at hospitals where readmission rates were high, average, or low.

The researchers found a small but positive correlation between reduced readmissions and reduced mortality rates for the three conditions. “We can say that readmission reductions did not result in increased mortality. If anything, they may have decreased mortality,” said first author Kumar Dharmarajan, M.D., assistant professor of medicine.

The correlation between reduced rates for readmissions and mortality may be due to steps that hospitals have taken to improve hospital and post-hospital care, he said. Those strategies include: better preparing patients and families for discharge; more timely follow-up; and improved communication with outpatient providers.

Dharmarajan and his colleagues also found that the link between reduced readmissions and reduced mortality was even stronger at 90 days compared to 30 days after hospital discharge, he said.

The findings may inform health policy. “Based on this evidence, there is no reason to revise policies to address unintended consequences of reducing hospital readmissions,” he said.

“Our study validates that the national focus on readmissions improved outcomes without causing unintended harm,” said senior author Harlan Krumholz, M.D. “Thousands and thousands of readmissions are being avoided every year without any evidence of people being harmed — that is a victory of improving the quality of care,” he said.

Other authors on the study are Yongfei Wang, Zhenqui Lin, Sharon-Lise Normand, Joseph Ross, Leora Horwitz, Nihar Desai, Lisa Suter, Elizabeth Drye, Susannah Bernheim, and Harlan Krumholz. All authors work under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to develop and maintain performance measure.

Study authors were supported in part by the National Institute on Aging, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the American Federation for Aging Research, and the Yale Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.