June 16, 2026 08:26 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Tragedy in the skies: Five IAF personnel killed in AN-32 crash in Assam | 'Ask probe officers whether I hid anything': Abhishek Banerjee hits back after pre-dawn police search | Police storm Abhishek Banerjee's house at 3 am tracking aide, Mamata arrives; seizure list says 'NIL' | Big boost for India's security: DRDO successfully tests advanced missile shield | Indian-origin man jailed for 34 years in UK over horrific kidnap, torture and rape case | Mamata's nightmare deepens! Saayoni Ghosh, Dev, Rachana Banerjee among 19 rebel MPs seeking TMC split | Trump claims US 'ended war with Iran', Tehran yet to confirm a deal | Heartbreak for Indian sports: Manu Bhaker's mentor Jaspal Rana passes away at 49 | Three Indian seafarers, missing after US strike on tanker near Oman, confirmed dead | 'Choose your side': TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee's ultimatum to Mamata in open revolt against Abhishek
Anil Deshmukh

Anil Deshmukh again sent to ED custody

| @indiablooms | Nov 08, 2021, at 12:48 am

Mumbai/UNI: The Bombay High Court on Sunday set aside a Special PMLA Court order granting 14 days' judicial custody to former Maharashtra home minister Anil Deshmukh and remanded him back to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for five days.

Vacation Judge Justice MJ Jamdar on Sunday passed an order in response to an urgent plea filed by the ED, challenging Special Court Judge PR Sitre's ruling on Saturday, declining the agency's plea for extension of Deshmukh's custody by nine more days.

Deshmukh's lawyers Senior Advocate Vikram Chaudhri and Aniket Nikam submitted to the court that without getting into merits or maintainability of the ED application, they were volunteering cooperation and not shying away from the investigation and hence, not objecting to the further remand.

ED's lawyers, Additional Solicitor-General Anil Singh and Advocate Shreeram Shirsat argued in the Bombay High Court that they were not granted further custody by the Special PMLA Court, thus denial of sufficient and adequate opportunity to probe the case having serious ramifications and when the investigations are at a crucial state.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.