August 15, 2026 10:13 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe | From guns to glamour: Former women Maoists walk the ramp in Chhattisgarh | Netaji row: Suvendu Adhikari govt strips BJP MP Anant Maharaj of state honour | Sukhbir Badal attacked by Nihang Sikh with kirpan at Maharashtra gurdwara; assailant detained | ‘If you cannot do it, we will pass an order’: Supreme Court’s final warning to Centre on food labels | ‘Time to move on’: Bombay HC sends strong message in Vijay Mallya-bank dispute
SIR
Supreme Court invokes special power to allow restored voters to vote. Photo: SC website/ChatGPT

Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote

| @indiablooms | Apr 16, 2026, at 05:36 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The controversial voter revision drive in West Bengal took a new turn on Thursday after the Supreme Court allowed voters whose names are cleared by appellate tribunals within a set timeline to cast their votes in the upcoming Assembly elections, media reports said.

Supreme Court Order in Detail

The top court directed that all deleted voters cleared by the appellate tribunal till April 21 will be allowed to vote in the first phase of polling on April 23.
Similarly, voters whose names are restored by the tribunal till April 27 will be permitted to vote in the second and final phase on April 29.
However, voters not cleared within the stipulated timeline will not be eligible to vote in this year’s Assembly elections.

The Supreme Court passed the order invoking Article 142 of the Constitution, which empowers it to pass directions to ensure “complete justice” in any matter before it.
 
Why were they not allowed to vote earlier?
 

They were not allowed to vote earlier because the voter list had been frozen by the Election Commission of India (ECI) ahead of the elections.

As per ECI norms, the electoral roll is locked on specific cut-off dates (April 6 and April 9 in this case) to ensure a final, error-free list for polling. 

Once the list is frozen, no new names can be added or deleted, except under specific legal or court directions.

This meant that even if voters were later cleared or restored through tribunal proceedings, their names could not automatically be included in the roll because the revision process had already been halted for election preparation.

The Supreme Court’s intervention created a limited exception, allowing voters cleared within defined deadlines to still be included for voting in the upcoming phases.

Scale of Voter Deletions

Nearly 91 lakh voters have been removed from the electoral rolls during the Special Summary Revision (SIR) exercise.

Over 27 lakh names were deleted from 60 lakh adjudicated cases

An additional 63 lakh names had already been removed earlier
 
Murshidabad, a Muslim-majority district, recorded the highest deletions, with around 4.5 lakh names struck off from 11 lakh adjudicated cases
What It Means for Voters

The Supreme Court had earlier directed the formation of appellate tribunals to hear appeals against voter deletions. 
 
However, these hearings are unlikely to conclude before polling begins.
  • Phase 1 polling: April 23
  • Phase 2 polling: April 29
The court also clarified that interim inclusion of voters who fail verification cannot be permitted.

Why It Matters

West Bengal is among five poll-bound states where the SIR exercise is underway—the first large-scale revision since 2002.

With elections just days away, the deletion of nearly 91 lakh voters could have significantly impacted electoral strategies and outcomes across the state.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.