September 02, 2026 05:20 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
CJP calls off Sept 5 Delhi march after Supreme Court quashes FIRs against protesters | ‘Dismantle entire terror ecosystem’: Modi’s strong message at SCO Summit in Shehbaz’s presence | Modi’s big appeal after 7.8% GDP growth: ‘Don’t travel abroad, avoid destination weddings’ | Modi-Pezeshkian talks: Iran seeks India’s 'extensive contacts' to end West Asia war | Indus Waters Treaty row: India rejects Hague court order, says ‘no jurisdiction’ over its sovereign decisions | India beats the odds with 7.8% GDP growth; PM Modi has a message for critics | PM Modi meets Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian during SCO summit in Kyrgyzstan | ‘Islam superior to all religions’: Karnataka minister’s remark sparks BJP-Congress war; resignation demand grows | PM Modi meets Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian during SCO summit in Kyrgyzstan | VHP breaks silence on Durga Puja ‘guidelines’: No blanket non-veg ban, clarifies stand on theme pandals amid backlash

Child born out of marriage between Muslim man and Hindu woman legitimate, but wedlock irregular: Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Jan 23, 2019, at 12:43 pm

New Delhi, Jan 23 (IBNS): The Supreme Court has ruled that a child who is born out of a marriage between a Muslim man and a Hindu woman is legitimate though such a wedlock is irregular, media reports said.

The child is therefore entitled to inherit his father's property, said the top court.

A bench of Justices NV Ramana and Mohan M Shantanagoudar ruled the child is legitimate though the Mohammedan Law holds such a marriage as an "irregular" one.

The court's observation has been quoted by The Indian Express, "Thus, based on the above consistent view, we conclude that the marriage of a Muslim man with an idolater or fire­worshipper is neither a valid (sahih) nor a void (batil) marriage, but is merely an irregular (fasid) marriage. Any child born out of such wedlock (fasid marriage) is entitled to claim a share in his father’s property."

"It would not be out of place to emphasise at this juncture that since Hindus are idol worshippers, which includes worship of physical images/statues through offering of flowers, adornment, etc., it is clear that the marriage of a Hindu female with a Muslim male is not a regular or valid (sahih) marriage, but merely an irregular (fasid) marriage," the bench has been quoted by The Indian Express.

Citing the legal effect of such an irregular marriage, the apex court said the 'Hindu' wife, however, cannot inherit her husband's property.

The Supreme Court gave the ruling while hearing a petition filed by one Shamsudeen, who is a son of a Muslim father and a Hindu mother, over a property dispute with his cousin.

The top court upheld the verdict of the trial court and Kerala High Court which ruled Shamsudeen is a legitimate son of his parents.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.