February 10, 2026 10:03 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Won’t allow any impediment in SIR’: Supreme Court pulls up Mamata govt over delay in sharing officers’ details | India-US trade deal: ‘Negotiations always two-way’, says Amul MD amid farmers’ concerns | Khamenei breaks 37-year-old ritual for first time amid escalating Iran-US tensions | India must push for energy independence amid global uncertainty: Vedanta chairman Anil Agarwal | Kanpur horror: Lamborghini driven by businessman’s son rams vehicles, injures six | ‘Namaste Trump beat Howdy Modi’: Congress slams PM Over India-US trade deal | Historic India-US trade pact: Tariffs cut, $500B market opportunity unlocked! | Big call from RBI: Repo rate stays at 5.25%, neutral stance continues | RG Kar scam twist: Court issues non-bailable warrant against whistle-blower Akhtar Ali | Court snub for Vijay: Madras HC rejects plea in ₹1.5 crore tax case
Excise Policy
Photo courtesy: Facebook/Arvind Kejriwal

Delhi excise policy case: Arvind Kejriwal moves sessions court challenging ACMM summons

| @indiablooms | Mar 15, 2024, at 12:35 am

New Delhi/UNI: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Thursday moved the sessions court challenging the summons issued to him by Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) Court, which directed him to appear before it on March 16 on the Enforcement Directorate (ED) complaint over the non-compliance of summons in the money laundering case related to the alleged excise policy case.

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) Divya Malhotra earlier after hearing the submissions on behalf of Enforcement Directorate (ED) took cognizance of the complaint and listed the matter for appearance of Kejriwal on Saturday.

Counsel for ED had submitted that the Assistant Director, ED issued summons dated 12.01.2024, 31.01.2024 and 14.02.2024 to the proposed accused "to give evidence in connection with the investigation or proceedings under PMLA in pursuance of his powers under Section 50(2), PMLA. He is a public servant within the meaning of Section 21, IPC by virtue of Section 40,PMLA."

The summonses were addressed to the respondent/proposed accused at his official e-mail address and the delivery of such summonses is prima facie evidence from the fact that the proposed accused sent replies to them.

The government counsel submitted that as per the mandate of Section 50(3) of the Act, the respondent/proposed accused was legally bound to comply with the summons but allegedly he failed to do so.

He said this is the second complaint against the same person with the similar allegations and every non-compliance of the summons issued by a public servant would tantamount to a separate offence.

It is submitted that Kejriwal has been issued eight summons in the case. ED had earlier filed a complaint case against Kejriwal for not complying with the initial three summons issued to him which is also listed on March 16.

The Enforcement Directorate has alleged that the excise policy was implemented as part of a conspiracy to give wholesale business profit of 12 percent to certain private companies.

The ED has alleged that the accused were in touch with Kejriwal regarding the preparation of the Excise policy for 2021-22.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.