August 15, 2026 07:34 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe | From guns to glamour: Former women Maoists walk the ramp in Chhattisgarh | Netaji row: Suvendu Adhikari govt strips BJP MP Anant Maharaj of state honour | Sukhbir Badal attacked by Nihang Sikh with kirpan at Maharashtra gurdwara; assailant detained | ‘If you cannot do it, we will pass an order’: Supreme Court’s final warning to Centre on food labels | ‘Time to move on’: Bombay HC sends strong message in Vijay Mallya-bank dispute
Parambrata and Swastika shared posts with alleged potential of inciting violence. Photo: Official Facebook pages.

FIR against Parambrata Chatterjee, Swastika Mukherjee over remarks linked to 2021 post-poll violence

| @indiablooms | May 21, 2026, at 09:05 pm

A fresh legal controversy has surfaced around Bengali actor-director Parambrata Chatterjee and actress Swastika Mukherjee after a complaint and application seeking an FIR were filed against them at Kolkata’s Gariahat Police Station.

Allegations linked to 2021 post-poll violence

The complaint, filed by Joydeep Sen, accuses the two actors of allegedly inciting violence in the aftermath of the 2021 West Bengal Assembly election results.

According to the complaint, social media posts shared by Parambrata Chatterjee and Swastika Mukherjee on May 2, 2021 — the day election results were declared — contained remarks described as “sexually colored” and “mocking” in nature.

The complainant has alleged that the comments contributed to an atmosphere of hostility and encouraged attacks against political opponents during the tense post-poll period.

The application also links the alleged remarks to the murder of BJP worker Abhijit Sarkar, claiming the online comments influenced acts of violence.

Complaint filed at Gariahat Police Station

The FIR application was submitted at the Gariahat Police Station in Kolkata on May 21, 2026.

Police are yet to officially confirm whether an FIR has been registered in the matter.

Neither Parambrata Chatterjee nor Swastika Mukherjee has publicly reacted to the allegations so far.

Parambrata’s previous legal controversies

This is not the first time Parambrata Chatterjee has found himself embroiled in legal disputes.

2009 adultery complaint

In 2009, a bailable arrest warrant was issued against the actor following a complaint filed by Pramit Sen, the estranged husband of Swastika Mukherjee.

The complaint accused the actor of adultery and criminal enticement. Parambrata was later granted bail.

Bangladesh visa allegation in 2017

In 2017, Bangladeshi filmmaker Gazi Rakayet filed a general diary against Parambrata at Banani Police Station in Dhaka, alleging that he had worked in Bangladesh using a tourist visa instead of a work permit.

2016 talk show controversy

The actor was also drawn into controversy in 2016 over alleged “sexually colored” comments made during a television talk show appearance.

Distancing himself from industry disputes

In November 2025, Parambrata had announced that he would no longer pursue legal action in disputes involving the Federation of Cine Technicians and Workers of Eastern India (FCTWEI), stating that he wanted to avoid further bitterness within the film industry.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.