September 16, 2026 12:44 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed | Gurugram horror caught on camera: ‘I felt unsafe’—car chases, rams woman biker and flees | BRICS veg menu row: ‘Why shouldn’t we showcase it?’—Harsh Goenka hits back after Rahul Gandhi’s ‘80%’ remark | India-UAE Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in focus: Modi meets Abu Dhabi Crown Prince on BRICS sidelines | Xi Jinping lands in India for BRICS; big Modi meeting set for New Delhi | ‘Hospitality on another level’: South African official stunned by India’s BRICS hosting | Suvendu Adhikari eats fish bhog at Kalighat Temple amid Bageshwar Baba row | Bangladeshi Hindu monk Chinmoy Krishna Das breaks down emotionally as he gets 5-hour parole to attend mother’s funeral | Sheikh Hasina’s daughter Saima Wazed quits WHO post amid fraud allegations | After days of silence, China confirms Xi Jinping’s India visit for BRICS Summit

Gujarat assembly passes draconian anti-terror and crime bill

| | Mar 31, 2015, at 07:50 pm
Ahmedabad, Mar 31 (IBNS) Amid a walkout by the Opposition the Gujarat Assembly on Tuesday passed a controversial anti-terror bill that was in the past rejected by two former Indian presidents.

The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Bill was passed in the state Assembly by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Tuesday.

The bill is similar to the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA).

In the past former President AJP Abdul Kalam and Pratibha Patil had refused to sign off the proposal and had suggested some amendments.

The bill was thus passed for the fourth time in past 12 years.

Gujarat junior Home Minister Rajni Patel was quoted saying that the bill is necessary to control not only terrorism but also organized crime.

The bill reportedly gives too much power to the police and confessions to cops, phone call interceptions and recordings are admissible evidence under this Bill if it was made into a law, said its opponents.

Human rights activists slammed the bill saying it will lead to custodial torture. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.