'I won’t bend': Delhi High Court judge rejects Kejriwal’s recusal plea in sharp rebuke
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma refused to step aside from hearing the Delhi liquor policy case, declaring her oath is to the Constitution and not to “pressure” or litigants’ perceptions.
Dismissing former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s plea, the judge held that recusal cannot be granted on personal apprehensions without solid proof.
She underlined that judicial impartiality is presumed unless clearly disproven.
Strong words: ‘A lie repeated isn’t truth’
In a pointed observation, Justice Sharma warned that repeated allegations—whether in court or online—do not become facts, cautioning against attempts to influence judicial proceedings.
She said stepping aside would send a dangerous signal, allowing litigants to “manage justice” by choosing judges, ultimately weakening public trust in the judiciary.
Past reliefs, no bias then? Court questions timing
The court noted that AAP leaders, including Manish Sisodia and Sanjay Singh, had previously received relief without raising bias concerns—questioning why objections surfaced now.
CBI challenge keeps case alive
The case stems from a petition by the Central Bureau of Investigation challenging a lower court order that discharged all accused, including Kejriwal, in the now-scrapped excise policy case.
Justice Sharma made it clear: courts cannot function on suspicion or narrative, reinforcing that judicial duty must remain insulated from public and political pressure.
Support Our Journalism
We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism
IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.
Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
