August 15, 2026 04:07 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe | From guns to glamour: Former women Maoists walk the ramp in Chhattisgarh | Netaji row: Suvendu Adhikari govt strips BJP MP Anant Maharaj of state honour | Sukhbir Badal attacked by Nihang Sikh with kirpan at Maharashtra gurdwara; assailant detained | ‘If you cannot do it, we will pass an order’: Supreme Court’s final warning to Centre on food labels | ‘Time to move on’: Bombay HC sends strong message in Vijay Mallya-bank dispute
Cauvery Dispute
(L-R) Tamil Nadu LoP Udhayanidhi Stalin and CM C Joseph Vijay. Photo: Udhayanidhi X/TVK website

'I'm ready to be humiliated': Vijay, Udhayanidhi Stalin clash in Tamil Nadu Assembly over Cauvery dispute

| @indiablooms | Aug 07, 2026, at 01:30 pm

Chennai/IBNS: Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay and Leader of Opposition Udhayanidhi Stalin engaged in a heated exchange in the state Assembly on Friday over the long-standing Cauvery river dispute, particularly Karnataka's proposed Mekedatu dam project, media reports said.

The two leaders traded barbs as Stalin questioned the state government's approach to preventing the construction of the dam, while Vijay defended his administration's handling of the issue.

Stalin questions government's stand

Raising the issue in the Assembly, Stalin accused the government of not doing enough to stop the Mekedatu dam project.

He also questioned why the Tamil Nadu government had not convened an all-party meeting, pointing out that Karnataka had held a similar meeting on the issue.

Vijay rejects demand for all-party meeting

Responding to the criticism, Vijay said his government would take all necessary steps to safeguard Tamil Nadu's interests and noted that the Assembly had already passed a resolution opposing the Mekedatu dam.

"There is no need to convene an all-party meeting. Please do not play politics on the Mekedatu dam issue," Vijay was quoted as saying by India Today.

Row over proposed Bengaluru visit

Stalin also criticised Vijay's reported plan to visit Bengaluru for talks with the Karnataka government.

"The government first leaked the Chief Minister's plan to visit Bengaluru. Later, when there was opposition, the Chief Minister denied it," Stalin was quoted as saying by NDTV.

According to reports, Vijay had planned to travel to Bengaluru to discuss the issue, but the visit was postponed at the request of Karnataka Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar, who cited heightened tensions and protests surrounding the Cauvery dispute.

Shivakumar reportedly suggested that Vijay visit the drought-hit Cauvery basin at a later date.

'Ready to be humiliated for Tamil Nadu'

Defending his proposal to hold talks with Karnataka, Vijay said dialogue was necessary despite political criticism.

"When hostile countries are trying to solve issues through talks, I thought of having talks with our neighbouring state. Some asked what if we are humiliated out of such an attempt. Even if that happened, I am ready to get humiliated for the people of Tamil Nadu."

What is the Cauvery water dispute?

The Cauvery water dispute centres on the sharing of water from the Cauvery River, which originates in Karnataka's Kodagu district, flows through Tamil Nadu, and drains into the Bay of Bengal. The river is a vital source of drinking water, irrigation and hydroelectric power.

The conflict dates back to agreements signed in 1892 and 1924 between the princely state of Mysore (now Karnataka) and the Madras Presidency (now Tamil Nadu). Karnataka has long argued that these agreements disproportionately favoured Tamil Nadu.

Why does the dispute persist?

The key issues include:

  • The allocation of Cauvery water, especially during years of deficient rainfall.
  • Karnataka's demand for a larger share to meet the needs of its growing population and expanding agricultural sector.
  • Tamil Nadu's insistence on receiving its allocated share to protect farmers in the Cauvery delta, who depend heavily on the river for irrigation.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.