August 15, 2026 04:24 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe | From guns to glamour: Former women Maoists walk the ramp in Chhattisgarh
SIR
Supreme Court issues a number of directives to ECI over SIR. Gemini recreation of images sourced from Mamata Banerjee/Facebook, SC website, IBNS and ECI/Facebook

Jolt to ECI over SIR! SC allows BLAs at hearing, questions 'logical discrepancy'; TMC declares 'BJP's game over'

| @indiablooms | Jan 19, 2026, at 04:35 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court’s intervention in the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process has handed West Bengal’s ruling Trinamool Congress a major political boost ahead of the 2026 Assembly polls.

The apex court on Monday directed the poll panel to conduct verification of voters flagged under the “logical discrepancies” category in a transparent and citizen-friendly manner.

A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Dipankar Datta and Joymalya Bagchi ordered the Election Commission to publish the list of voters who had received notices under this category.

The court noted that nearly 1.25 crore people had been served such notices, a move that had drawn sharp criticism from the TMC, which alleged that the SIR exercise was being used to disenfranchise genuine voters in the poll-bound state.

In relief for the affected voters, the bench ruled that those who received notices would be allowed to submit documents or objections through authorised agents, including Booth Level Agents (BLAs).

The court also directed that verification centres be set up at Panchayat Bhavans or Block offices so that people are not forced to travel long distances for hearings. If documents were found inadequate, officials must provide another opportunity for hearing, and receipts of submissions must be duly certified.

Addressing law-and-order concerns, the bench asked the state government to provide adequate manpower to the Election Commission and held the Director General of Police responsible for maintaining peace during the process.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for TMC petitioners, argued that even voters whose names were already part of the draft electoral roll had been issued notices on flimsy grounds such as variations in surname spellings or age gaps with parents of less than 15 years.

Justice Bagchi questioned the logic behind treating such cases as discrepancies, remarking that a 15-year age gap between mother and child could not automatically be deemed irregular, particularly in a country where child marriage remained a reality.

Reacting to the order, TMC national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee described the verdict as a decisive setback for the BJP. He alleged that nearly one crore names had been targeted for deletion and that the court had protected the democratic rights of Bengal’s people.

“The BJP’s SIR game is over. Our voting rights were being threatened, but the Supreme Court has given them a firm rebuke,” Banerjee said, adding that the courtroom defeat would soon be mirrored in the ballot box.

In a fiery statement invoking Bengal’s historical legacy, he asserted that the state had never bowed before outsiders and would resist any attempt to undermine its democratic voice.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.