April 18, 2026 05:43 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Panic reaction’: Rahul Gandhi on women’s bill, says PM Modi ‘wants to send a message’ | Adani Group shares rise as Gautam Adani becomes Asia’s richest, overtakes Mukesh Ambani | TCS Nashik ‘conversion’ case accused seeks anticipatory bail citing pregnancy | IT raids TMC candidate Debasish Kumar’s premises ahead of Bengal polls | Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote | 'Women won't spare you': PM Modi warns Opposition over resistance to quota bill | Vijay booked in 3 cases over poll code violation ahead of Tamil Nadu polls | 'Black law': Stalin burns copy of 'delimitation' bill, slams Modi govt | TCS halts Nashik BPO operations amid sexual abuse, conversion allegations | ‘We are surprised’: SC stays Pawan Khera’s bail over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife
Kiren Rijiju
Image credit: Facebook/ Kiren Rijiju

Judges don't face elections: Kiren Rijiju's jibe amid Centre vs judiciary row

| @indiablooms | Jan 24, 2023, at 03:46 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju, one of the key speakers in the judges' row, Monday said judges do not have to contest elections or face public scrutiny but people still watch their work.

"The people are watching you and judging you. Your judgments, your work process, how you dispense justice... The people can see, and assess... They form opinions," he said to great applause at an event of the Delhi Bar Association.

He also reminded his audience that with the advent of social media, people now have the power to speak.

"It is not like the old days, when there was no platform and only netalog (leaders) could speak," he said.

In this context, he said the Chief Justice had sought his help about the abuse judges face on social media.

"How to control that? Now, judges cannot respond to it on social media. The government was requested to take a firm step... I have taken note of it and have the solution," he added.

He said there have been many changes since 1947, so it would be wrong to think that the existing system will carry on and never be questioned.

This comes government has been seeking a larger role in the appointment of judges, arguing that the legislature is supreme since it represents the will of the people.

The Supreme Court has issued a stern reminder to the government that while parliament can make a law, it is within the court's power to "scrutinise" it.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.