September 16, 2026 04:20 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Gurugram biker crash: Main accused Kalyan Bainsla sent to police custody for 2 days | ‘Just tax collection’: Ashneer Grover slams new UPI charges above Rs 2,000 | India condemns Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia, warns of threat to Red Sea shipping | Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed | Gurugram horror caught on camera: ‘I felt unsafe’—car chases, rams woman biker and flees | BRICS veg menu row: ‘Why shouldn’t we showcase it?’—Harsh Goenka hits back after Rahul Gandhi’s ‘80%’ remark | India-UAE Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in focus: Modi meets Abu Dhabi Crown Prince on BRICS sidelines | Xi Jinping lands in India for BRICS; big Modi meeting set for New Delhi | ‘Hospitality on another level’: South African official stunned by India’s BRICS hosting | Suvendu Adhikari eats fish bhog at Kalighat Temple amid Bageshwar Baba row

Nirbhaya's friend says India's daughter far from truth

| | Mar 10, 2015, at 10:45 pm
New Delhi, Mar 10(IBNS) As the ban on a documentary on the 2012 Delhi gang-rape and murder has kicked up a heated nationwide debate, the sole witness to the incident, says the film is "far from the truth."

Avinandra Pandey, who was accompanying Nribhaya on the fateful night and was severely beaten up by the attackers on board a private bus, has told CNN-IBN that Leslee Udwin's "India's daughter" is "unbalanced" and does not portray what really happened.

"The documentary is unbalanced as the victim's viewpoint is missing. The facts are hidden and the content is fake. Only Jyoti and I know what happened on that night and the documentary is far from truth," he says.

Pandey saus he has never heard the name of tutor Satendra, who features in the documentary. "Moreover, how does he know which movie I wanted to watch on that night," he asks.

The documentary also features the interview of one of the rapists, Mukesh Singh, who is on death row and his statement that the girls themselves are more responsible than boys for rapes  has created a great controversy prompting the government to put a ban on the film.

Questions were also raised on how a murder convict can be interviewed inside the prison.

"A controversy was created unnecessarily and was sensationalised. The documentary made fun of emotions and questioned the law and order situation in our country," Pandey says.

Defending the government's action, he says, "The documentary has impaired country's image and questioned law and order situation. It  showed that any individual can enter the Central Jail of our country and can interview a criminal."

Replying a question  whether he was approached to be part of the documentary, Pandey says, "I was approached by many people and it started one and a half years ago, in 2013. I did not want to be part of it as I was not convinced by its motive. Also, I was not mentally prepared and had health issues as well.".

He also appeals that there should be a censor board for documentaries as well.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.