September 17, 2026 02:53 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests | Gurugram biker crash: Main accused Kalyan Bainsla sent to police custody for 2 days | ‘Just tax collection’: Ashneer Grover slams new UPI charges above Rs 2,000 | India condemns Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia, warns of threat to Red Sea shipping | Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed | Gurugram horror caught on camera: ‘I felt unsafe’—car chases, rams woman biker and flees | BRICS veg menu row: ‘Why shouldn’t we showcase it?’—Harsh Goenka hits back after Rahul Gandhi’s ‘80%’ remark | India-UAE Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in focus: Modi meets Abu Dhabi Crown Prince on BRICS sidelines | Xi Jinping lands in India for BRICS; big Modi meeting set for New Delhi | ‘Hospitality on another level’: South African official stunned by India’s BRICS hosting

No internal democracy in AAP: Ilmi stokes smouldering fire

| | Mar 02, 2015, at 10:37 pm
New Delhi, Mar 2(IBNS) As the Aam Aadmi Party's resounding electoral victory in Delhi slowly gives way to its internal conflict with rift widening between Arvind Kejriwal and Yogendra Yadav-Prashant Bhushan camps, party's former member Shazia Ilmi on Monday alleged that the organisation was suffering from lack of internal democracy and transparency.

 "There is absence of internal democracy in AAP," Ilmi, who is now a Bharatiya Janata Party leader, said.

In what appeared to be a BJP move drive the wedge deeper within the AAP, Ilmi supported Yadav and Bhushan, whose prominence in the party may be cutrailed in the AAP national executive meet on March 4, saying both the leaders were right in their stand.

"Bhushan and Yadav are very senior, what they are saying is right. There is no transparency in the party, there is nepotism," she said.

Her remarks came after reports of a tussle among the top AAP leaders came to the fore.

Pro-Kejriwal leaders alleged that Yogendra Yadav, Prashant Bhushan and Shanti Bhushan were conspiring against Arvind Kejriwal.

AAP's Delhi secretary Dilip Pandey alleged that Yogendra Yadav, Prashant Bhushan and Shanti Bhushan  acted "in concert towards a singular aim of weakening the party and then replacing Kejriwal with Yadav as party head."

He in a letter targeting the anti-Kejriwal group said: "Worst part was when, a few weeks before elections, Mr Prashant Bhushan said in presence of a senior Party Leader and a Mission Vistar member that he would rather want the party to loose the elections so that Kejriwal could be removed and a major overhaul of the party could be carried out. Bhushan refused to campaign for the party and also planted several anti-party stories at a time when the party was going through its most severe crisis."

He said in another part of the letter addressed to Pankaj Gupta, National Secretary, Member (Disciplinary Committee): "Before General Elections, 2014, Mr Vijay Raman, who was personal assistant of Mr Yogendra Yadav and was handling his election campaign, phoned Mr Satya, an important party member and told him that Mr. Yadav wanted to interview him for a role in his core team. When Mr Satya went to meet Raman, the latter told him that Mr Arvind Kejriwal didn't have the required political acumen and it was imperative for Mr Yogendra Yadav to take over as National Convenor of AAP after removing Kejriwal from the post. Mr Satya was shocked to hear this. He informed senior members of the party of how Mr Yadav's office was conspiring against Kejriwal and hatching conspiracies to take over as the party convenor."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.