August 16, 2026 01:01 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After SC rebuke, BCI chief apologises to NALSAR students over enrolment freeze row | Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe
P Chidambaram's (L) remark on Delhi blast has triggered a political slugfest. Photo: Official Facebook/X/Videograb.

P Chidambaram’s ‘home-grown terrorists’ remark sparks BJP-Congress clash after Delhi car blast

| @indiablooms | Nov 13, 2025, at 11:55 pm

A political storm has erupted after senior Congress leader P. Chidambaram described the accused in the Delhi blast near Red Fort as “home-grown terrorists,” prompting sharp reactions from the BJP and its allies.

Chidambaram’s comment, made on social media platform X, questioned the circumstances that “turn Indian citizens- even educated persons into terrorists.”

“I have maintained before and after the Pahalgam terror attack that there are two kinds of terrorists—foreign-trained infiltrated terrorists and home-grown terrorists. The government knows this too. We should ask ourselves what circumstances turn educated Indian citizens into terrorists,” Chidambaram wrote.

The remark came days after the Red Fort car blast that killed at least 13 people and injured around 20, with investigations revealing the involvement of doctors linked to the Al-Falah University in Faridabad.

The comment has drawn fierce criticism from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which accused the Congress of sympathising with terrorists.

“The Congress is giving soft support to terrorists,” alleged BJP spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari.

“Terrorists are beasts who need to be killed. When they get hurt, Congress leaders start screaming. Why do they speak like spokespersons of terrorists?” said Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi.

Senior BJP leader Nalin Kohli said, “Terrorists are terrorists. It doesn’t matter what classification Congress wants to make. In the fight against terror, there are only two sides—those who stand with terrorists and those who stand against them. Mr. Chidambaram should explain to the victims which side he is on.”

Echoing similar views, Neeraj Kumar of the JD(U) said, “A terrorist is a terrorist. What’s this new language- foreign or home-grown? Congress seems to be inventing categories to soften the blow.”

Earlier, the Congress had blamed the government for what it called a “major intelligence failure” and a “delayed response” in declaring the Delhi explosion a terror attack.

The debate has also turned toward the role of education in radicalisation, as three of the accused are reportedly practising doctors.

Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said, “The Delhi blast has once again proved that some diseases cannot be cured by education. If someone has bad intentions, education only sharpens their ability to cause harm.”

As the political blame game intensifies, investigators continue to probe the alleged terror module linked to Jaish-e-Mohammed women’s wing, with several university staffers and administrators now under scrutiny.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.