February 10, 2026 03:57 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Won’t allow any impediment in SIR’: Supreme Court pulls up Mamata govt over delay in sharing officers’ details | India-US trade deal: ‘Negotiations always two-way’, says Amul MD amid farmers’ concerns | Khamenei breaks 37-year-old ritual for first time amid escalating Iran-US tensions | India must push for energy independence amid global uncertainty: Vedanta chairman Anil Agarwal | Kanpur horror: Lamborghini driven by businessman’s son rams vehicles, injures six | ‘Namaste Trump beat Howdy Modi’: Congress slams PM Over India-US trade deal | Historic India-US trade pact: Tariffs cut, $500B market opportunity unlocked! | Big call from RBI: Repo rate stays at 5.25%, neutral stance continues | RG Kar scam twist: Court issues non-bailable warrant against whistle-blower Akhtar Ali | Court snub for Vijay: Madras HC rejects plea in ₹1.5 crore tax case
Parliament breach
In image parliament security breach/ courtesy: UNI

Parliament security breach case: Delhi Court extends judicial custody of all 6 accused

| @indiablooms | Mar 02, 2024, at 02:30 am

New Delhi/IBNS/UNI: A Delhi court Friday extended the judicial custody of all the six accused arrested in connection with the Parliament security breach case.

The court listed all the applications of the accused, who levelled serious allegations against Delhi Police, for a hearing on March 11.

This case pertains to a security breach on the anniversary of the Parliament attack on December 13, 2023. Following the same, police arrested the accused Manoranjan, Neelam Azad, Sagar Sharma, Amol Shinde, Lalit Jha, and Mahesh Kumawat.

Counsel for accused Neelam Azad submitted before the court that she was suffering from back pain but was not provided the medicine by the jail authority. Neelam had earlier submitted before the court that a woman police officer had got her signature on a blank paper forcefully.

Government Counsel has objected to the allegations levelled by Neelam against the police officer.

After the hearing, the court directed her counsel to move an appropriate application seeking orders to jail authorities and adjourned the matter for arguments on March 11. The court directed the police to file the reply on the applications of the accused.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.