September 01, 2026 10:02 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
CJP calls off Sept 5 Delhi march after Supreme Court quashes FIRs against protesters | ‘Dismantle entire terror ecosystem’: Modi’s strong message at SCO Summit in Shehbaz’s presence | Modi’s big appeal after 7.8% GDP growth: ‘Don’t travel abroad, avoid destination weddings’ | Modi-Pezeshkian talks: Iran seeks India’s 'extensive contacts' to end West Asia war | Indus Waters Treaty row: India rejects Hague court order, says ‘no jurisdiction’ over its sovereign decisions | India beats the odds with 7.8% GDP growth; PM Modi has a message for critics | PM Modi meets Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian during SCO summit in Kyrgyzstan | ‘Islam superior to all religions’: Karnataka minister’s remark sparks BJP-Congress war; resignation demand grows | PM Modi meets Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian during SCO summit in Kyrgyzstan | VHP breaks silence on Durga Puja ‘guidelines’: No blanket non-veg ban, clarifies stand on theme pandals amid backlash
Image Credit: UNI Photo

SC to decide on Rafale verdict review on Feb 26

| @indiablooms | Feb 22, 2019, at 11:05 pm

New Delhi, Feb 22 (IBNS): Supreme Court on Tuesday will decide on petitions whether its December 14, 2018 verdict of giving the Centre a clean chit on the Rafale deal should be reviewed, media reports said.

A bench of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices L. Nageswara Rao and Sanjiv Khanna had conveyed to advocate Prashant Bhushan on Thursday that it would look into requests to hear review petitions against the verdict.

Apart from Bhushan, former Union ministers Arun Shourie and Yashwant Sinha had sought a review of the apex court judgment in the case saying the Supreme Court had been misled with "incorrect claims" made by the Centre.

Reports said the hearing would be conducted in the chambers and not in open court.

In its December order, the Supreme Court had said it found no reason to justify the corruption allegations in the case.

"There is no evidence of commercial favouritism to any private entity," the court had said.

 

 

Image Credit: UNI Photo
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.