August 22, 2026 01:47 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Rahul Gandhi stages dharna at Delhi police station over CJP protest crackdown, targets Amit Shah | CJP school tour turns chaotic in Jaipur: Cars vandalised, stones pelted as Ashutosh Ranka alleges BJP ‘goons’ attack | Vande Mataram row: Kangana Ranaut slams Sharmila Tagore, says ‘come out of Hindu-Muslim mindset’ | Jadavpur erupts again: ABVP-SFI clash, police barricades shattered as fresh tension grips area | Ex-Congress MP and 1984 anti-Sikh riots convict Sajjan Kumar dies while serving life sentence | India hits back at Pakistan: Structures outside High Commission demolished in Delhi | ‘Don’t daydream about my bedroom’: Kangana Ranaut fires back at Ramdev over ‘Gen Z’ row | Jadavpur University erupts at midnight: ABVP-Left student groups clash over meeting, BJP-CPI(M) leaders trade barbs | Vijay govt calls for action to stop students, youth from joining CJP, Left protests | Kolkata hotel fire kills 9: Bengal Minister Agnimitra Paul targets ex-TMC govt, CESC over licences
Image Credit: UNI

Supreme Court allows Travancore royal family to manage Padmanabhaswamy temple

| @indiablooms | Jul 13, 2020, at 07:24 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday allowed the appeal filed by the Travancore royal family and also accepted its Shebayatship (right to manage deity's property) over the famous Padmanabhaswamy temple in Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala.

A bench headed by Justice U U Lalit passed the verdict through video-conferencing after hearing the submissions in the case.

"We allow the appeals filed by the Travancore Royal family (Maharaja), and we also accept the Shebayatship of Travancore Royal family over the famous Padmanabhaswamy temple," the apex court said in its verdict.

The district judge, who was the executive officer appointed by the apex court, will continue to work and function as the administrative head of the temple, it said.

The top court's ruling effectively means that the "Ruler" under Instrument of Accession signed by the Princely state ruler with the Government of India at the time of independence is "ruler" by succession and will not end with the death of the ruler who signed the instrument of accession.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.