February 11, 2026 01:38 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bangladesh poll manifestos mirror India’s welfare schemes as BNP, Jamaat bet big on women, freebies | Drama ends: Pakistan makes U-turn on India boycott, to play T20 World Cup clash as per schedule | ‘Won’t allow any impediment in SIR’: Supreme Court pulls up Mamata govt over delay in sharing officers’ details | India-US trade deal: ‘Negotiations always two-way’, says Amul MD amid farmers’ concerns | Khamenei breaks 37-year-old ritual for first time amid escalating Iran-US tensions | India must push for energy independence amid global uncertainty: Vedanta chairman Anil Agarwal | Kanpur horror: Lamborghini driven by businessman’s son rams vehicles, injures six | ‘Namaste Trump beat Howdy Modi’: Congress slams PM Over India-US trade deal | Historic India-US trade pact: Tariffs cut, $500B market opportunity unlocked! | Big call from RBI: Repo rate stays at 5.25%, neutral stance continues
Shahi Eidgah Mosque
Photo courtesy: UNI

Supreme Court puts on hold plea of Hindu parties for survey of Shahi Eidgah Mosque

| @indiablooms | Jan 16, 2024, at 08:54 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday put in abeyance the plea of Hindu parties to appoint an advocate commissioner for survey of the Shahi Eidgah Mosque adjoining the Krishna Janmabhoomi temple in Mathura saying that the demand of Hindu parties is vague and too extensive.

A bench comprising Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Dipankar Datta clubbed the matter with another batch of petitions challenging the High Court order in nearly 18 suits relating to the Krishna Janmasthan Shahi Idgah land dispute and posted the matter to be heard on January 23.

Justice Sanjiv Khanna told the Hindu parties that the plea made by them to appoint a Commissioner was very vague and extensive and some important legal points arise in it. The Bench said, you have to be very specific and clear on what you want the commissioner to do?

The Supreme Court initially stayed the Allahabad High Court order of December 14 for the appointment of an advocate commissioner to oversee the survey of the mosque and told Senior Counsel Shyam Divan appearing for the Hindu parties that "you cannot make an omnibus application like this? It's so vague".

Shyam Divan protested a complete stay on the order and said the High Court may be allowed to at least work out the modalities of this survey.

To this, the bench said the commissioner shall not be appointed for now and posted the matter to January 23 to be heard with the other pending petitions in the same matter.

Advocate Tasneem Ahmadi appearing for the Idgah committee and the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Wakf Board argued that they do not have financial resources to travel to Allahabad High Court which is 600 Kilometers away and would prefer if the case is heard in Delhi High Court which is just 150 kilometer distance from their office.

Multiple suits regarding the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi-Idgah Mosque land dispute are pending before various courts in Mathura and Allahabad.

These suits have a common demand to reclaim 13.37 acres of land on which the Mosque stands and abuts the temple should be returned to the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust.

The Supreme Court seized to a challenge to a May 26, 2023 Allahabad High Court order by which it had transferred to itself all suits filed by the Hindu parties claiming right over the Mosque land.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.