September 01, 2026 10:53 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
CJP calls off Sept 5 Delhi march after Supreme Court quashes FIRs against protesters | ‘Dismantle entire terror ecosystem’: Modi’s strong message at SCO Summit in Shehbaz’s presence | Modi’s big appeal after 7.8% GDP growth: ‘Don’t travel abroad, avoid destination weddings’ | Modi-Pezeshkian talks: Iran seeks India’s 'extensive contacts' to end West Asia war | Indus Waters Treaty row: India rejects Hague court order, says ‘no jurisdiction’ over its sovereign decisions | India beats the odds with 7.8% GDP growth; PM Modi has a message for critics | PM Modi meets Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian during SCO summit in Kyrgyzstan | ‘Islam superior to all religions’: Karnataka minister’s remark sparks BJP-Congress war; resignation demand grows | PM Modi meets Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian during SCO summit in Kyrgyzstan | VHP breaks silence on Durga Puja ‘guidelines’: No blanket non-veg ban, clarifies stand on theme pandals amid backlash

Supreme Court to hear review petitions filed in Rafale case asap

| @indiablooms | Feb 21, 2019, at 01:08 pm

New Delhi, Feb 21 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Thursday said it will hear as soon as possible the review petitions filed in the Rafale case filed by several people.

"We will hear as soon as possible the review petitions filed in the case filed by many in the Rafale matter," the court said.

Senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan on Thursday mentioned before the top court and requested it to hear the petition seeking review of its verdict on Rafale deal.

To this, the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi said he will do something for the listing of the case as special bench is to be constituted for it.

Bhushan in his petition stated that several facts have come to light after the judgement was reserved in the matter last year, and the SC should hear the case and the judgement must be recalled.

Bhushan sought that an oral hearing in the open court to the petitioners’ should be assigned as the facts and circumstances of the case sufficiently necessitate, he said in his review petition. 

Image: UNI

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.