February 12, 2026 02:41 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bangladesh poll manifestos mirror India’s welfare schemes as BNP, Jamaat bet big on women, freebies | Drama ends: Pakistan makes U-turn on India boycott, to play T20 World Cup clash as per schedule | ‘Won’t allow any impediment in SIR’: Supreme Court pulls up Mamata govt over delay in sharing officers’ details | India-US trade deal: ‘Negotiations always two-way’, says Amul MD amid farmers’ concerns | Khamenei breaks 37-year-old ritual for first time amid escalating Iran-US tensions | India must push for energy independence amid global uncertainty: Vedanta chairman Anil Agarwal | Kanpur horror: Lamborghini driven by businessman’s son rams vehicles, injures six | ‘Namaste Trump beat Howdy Modi’: Congress slams PM Over India-US trade deal | Historic India-US trade pact: Tariffs cut, $500B market opportunity unlocked! | Big call from RBI: Repo rate stays at 5.25%, neutral stance continues
Abortion order
Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Supreme Court to review abortion order after Centre's concern for unborn

| @indiablooms | Oct 11, 2023, at 04:47 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Just 24 hours after the Supreme Court ordered a medical termination of pregnancy of a 26-week-old pregnant mother, the Centre cited a serious dilemma that the unborn child can be alive if aborted.

Soon, the Chief Justice of India decided to review the decision and asked the Centre to file a recall application which will be listed on Wednesday.

The Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud had to strike a balance between the life of an unborn child and the pleas of a mother who stated she would be unable to raise it.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court allowed the couple to abort their pregnancy after the petitioner argued that the woman, who is a mother of two children, is suffering from various health issues and from postnatal depression.

A medical board formed by AIIMS stated the baby is currently viable (showing signs of life and having a strong possibility of survival) adding that they need a directive from the Supreme Court on whether a feticide( stopping the fetal heart) be performed before the termination of the 26-week-old unwanted pregnancy.

The panel said the procedure is performed in cases when the foetus has an abnormal development, but it is generally not performed on a normal foetus.

The AIIMS panel stressed that if a feticide is not performed then it will not be termed as termination, but a preterm delivery where the baby needs intensive treatment and care. A baby born preterm needs intensive care and there is a high possibility that it can cause physical and mental disability.

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati told the bench headed by the Chief Justice that the report from AIIMS is not in accordance with the judgment that was given earlier.

Bhati said the foetus would be born alive and would be murder and not abortion of the baby.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.