August 15, 2026 07:35 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe | From guns to glamour: Former women Maoists walk the ramp in Chhattisgarh | Netaji row: Suvendu Adhikari govt strips BJP MP Anant Maharaj of state honour | Sukhbir Badal attacked by Nihang Sikh with kirpan at Maharashtra gurdwara; assailant detained | ‘If you cannot do it, we will pass an order’: Supreme Court’s final warning to Centre on food labels | ‘Time to move on’: Bombay HC sends strong message in Vijay Mallya-bank dispute
Probe
Representational Photo: Twisha Sharma Instagram/ChatGPT

Twisha Sharma death mystery deepens as crucial evidence ‘not shared’ during autopsy: Report

| @indiablooms | May 20, 2026, at 12:43 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The mystery surrounding the death of model-actor Twisha Sharma has deepened after fresh reports highlighted alleged lapses and inconsistencies in the handling of evidence during the investigation.

According to media reports, the controversy centres around a nylon belt that police reportedly recovered from the scene but did not hand over to the medical board conducting the autopsy.

Key evidence allegedly not shared with medical board

As the belt was not submitted to the medical team, doctors were reportedly unable to scientifically compare the ligature material with the marks found on Twisha’s neck, The Indian Express reported.

As a result, the connection between the two ligature marks observed during the autopsy at AIIMS Bhopal and the alleged material could not be conclusively established.

The autopsy report also mentioned multiple antemortem injuries on other parts of Twisha’s body.

SIT acknowledges lapse

A Special Investigation Team (SIT), headed by Misrod ACP Rajnish Kashyap, is currently probing the case.

The SIT has reportedly acknowledged that the belt was recovered from the scene but was not submitted to the medical board during the postmortem examination.

Kashyap said investigators are examining how the lapse occurred.

All about the Twisha Sharma death case

Twisha Sharma, a former beauty pageant participant and actor from Noida, was found dead at her matrimonial home in Bhopal’s Katara Hills area on May 12, 2026, just months after her marriage.

The case triggered widespread public attention and a major police investigation.

Police are probing allegations of dowry harassment, mental cruelty and possible abetment to suicide.

Twisha’s family accused her husband, Samarth Singh, and her in-laws of harassment and alleged there were suspicious injuries on her body.

CCTV footage and autopsy findings raise more questions

Recent reports claimed CCTV footage showed Twisha walking alone toward the terrace shortly before she was found unconscious.

Her husband is reportedly absconding after his anticipatory bail plea was rejected.

The autopsy reportedly concluded that the cause of death was hanging but also noted multiple blunt-force injuries, intensifying questions over the circumstances surrounding her death.

The case has become increasingly controversial following conflicting claims made by Twisha’s family and her mother-in-law, retired judge Giribala Singh.

Twisha’s family has also sought a second postmortem examination.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.