April 18, 2026 12:28 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Panic reaction’: Rahul Gandhi on women’s bill, says PM Modi ‘wants to send a message’ | Adani Group shares rise as Gautam Adani becomes Asia’s richest, overtakes Mukesh Ambani | TCS Nashik ‘conversion’ case accused seeks anticipatory bail citing pregnancy | IT raids TMC candidate Debasish Kumar’s premises ahead of Bengal polls | Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote | 'Women won't spare you': PM Modi warns Opposition over resistance to quota bill | Vijay booked in 3 cases over poll code violation ahead of Tamil Nadu polls | 'Black law': Stalin burns copy of 'delimitation' bill, slams Modi govt | TCS halts Nashik BPO operations amid sexual abuse, conversion allegations | ‘We are surprised’: SC stays Pawan Khera’s bail over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife
CJI
Image Credit: wikipedia.org

Two Delhi HC judges recuse from hearing plea challenging Justice D Y Chandrachud's appointment as CJI

| @indiablooms | Jan 14, 2023, at 01:25 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Delhi High Court Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad Friday opted out of hearing a plea that sought a review of an HC order dismissing a petition challenging the appointment of Justice D Y Chandrachud as the Chief Justice of India (CJI), reported media.

The plea also includes certain allegations against the judges, the division bench of the high court noted, adding that it cannot hear the case.

The petition will be heard by another bench on January 16, the bench headed by Chief Justice Sharma said.

On November 11, 200, the high court had dismissed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the appointment of Justice D Y Chandrachud as the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and Rs 1 lakh towards costs on the petitioner Sanjeev Kumar Tiwari, the national president of an organisation named Gram Uday Foundation.

While dismissing the plea, the bench had said the offices held by the constitutional functionaries in public trust are not open to denigration by self-styled warriors of public interest on the basis of superficial allegations.

In his review plea, the petitioner has sought to overrule the earlier order as well as to waive the costs.

"Imposing penalty for such a petition is the most unjust and unconstitutional action of the chief justice and his companion judge. Hence the review petition is filed," he alleged, according to the report.

Justice Chandrachud took oath as the 50th CJI on November 9, 2022.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.