May 16, 2026 08:51 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Kathak to Garba: Indian diaspora stuns PM Modi with grand welcome in Amsterdam | ‘Geography or history’: Indian Army chief issues blunt warning to Pakistan over terror support | India, UAE ink key energy deals during Modi’s visit amid West Asia tensions | ‘There can be no better Bengal CM’: Mithun Chakraborty praises Suvendu Adhikari | PM Modi adviser Sanjeev Sanyal frontrunner for Bengal Finance Minister: Report | FIR against Abhishek Banerjee over ‘provocative speeches’ during West Bengal poll campaign | Madhya Pradesh High Court holds Bhojshala complex disputed site to be a temple | ‘Even ex-CM can be probed’: Suvendu Adhikari’s big statement on RG Kar case | Big action in RG Kar case: Bengal CM Suvendu Adhikari suspends 3 IPS officers, including ex-CP Vineet Goyal | Modi’s UAE visit delivers major defence, energy deals amid Middle East tensions
Bengal Polls
The Calcutta High Court order on ECI's transfer of Bengal officers is perceived as a jolt to TMC supremo Mamata Banerjee. Photo: ChatGPT/AITC X/Wikimedia/Gemini

‘Unsubstantial allegations’: Calcutta HC dismisses plea on ECI’s officer transfers in Bengal

| @indiablooms | Mar 31, 2026, at 03:40 pm

Kolkata/IBNS: The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Election Commission of India (ECI)’s large-scale transfer of IPS and IAS officers in West Bengal following the announcement of Assembly elections.

The court observed that the petitioner, advocate Arka Kumar Nag, had himself acknowledged the ECI’s authority, and therefore could not contest the poll body’s jurisdiction.

Chief Justice Sujoy Paul noted that the plea clearly recognised the Commission’s power to transfer officers to ensure free and fair elections, leaving no scope to dispute its authority.

The bench further held that it cannot question the “administrative wisdom” of the ECI unless there is clear evidence of arbitrariness, mala fide intent, or violation of statutory provisions.

Terming the allegations of mala fide as “unsubstantial”, the court rejected the state government’s claim that the transfers had led to administrative paralysis, noting that all transferred officers were promptly replaced.

Dismissing charges of vindictiveness and selective targeting of West Bengal, the court said data showed that a higher number of officers had been transferred in other poll-bound states.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.