February 03, 2026 09:45 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court raps Meta, WhatsApp: ‘Theft of private information, won’t allow its use’ | ‘Completely surrendered’: Congress slams Modi after Trump’s trade deal move | PM Modi thanks 'dear friend' Trump for tariff reduction, hails strong US–India partnership | Trump announces US–India trade deal, lowers reciprocal tariffs to 18% | After Budget mayhem, bulls return: Sensex, Nifty stage sharp recovery | Dalai Lama wins first Grammy at 90 | Firing outside Rohit Shetty’s Mumbai home: 4 arrested, Bishnoi Gang link emerges | Female suicide attackers emerge at centre of deadly BLA assaults that rocked Pakistan’s Balochistan | Delhi blast: Probe reveals doctors' module planned attacks on global coffee chain | Begging bowl: Pakistan PM says he feels “ashamed” seeking loans abroad
Hijab Ban
Photo Courtesy: IOM/Anjam Rasool

France: Hijab ban during sports, ‘discriminatory and must be reversed’ , say experts

| @indiablooms | Oct 29, 2024, at 11:12 pm

Independent human rights experts on Monday called on France to reverse bans that prevent Muslim women and girls who wear the hijab from participating in sports, citing concerns that these restrictions are discriminatory and violate international human rights obligations.

The UN Human Rights Council-appointed experts criticised the decision by the French football and basketball federations to exclude players wearing the hijab from competitions, including at amateur level, and the French Government’s decision to prevent French athletes wearing the hijab from representing the country at last summer’s Paris Olympic Games.

Infringement

These measures, the experts argue, infringe on individuals’ rights to express their religion, identity, and beliefs, as well as their right to participate in cultural life.

France’s policies on the hijab run counter to its own declared commitments to inclusion and fail to meet the criteria for legitimate limitations on human rights under international law, the experts contended.

“The neutrality and secular nature of the State are not legitimate grounds for imposing restrictions on the rights to freedom of expression and freedom of religion or belief. Any limitations of these freedoms must be proportionate, necessary to reach one of the objectives stated in international law” the experts said, adding that they should never be based on “presumptions, assumptions or prejudices.”

Risks of stigmatisation

The experts also raised concerns over a recent decision by the Conseil d'État, France’s highest administrative court, to uphold the football federation’s hijab ban, as well as a proposed Senate bill aimed at further restricting hijab use in public.

The independent experts – who receive no salary, are not UN staff and do not represent any government – warned that the bill presents the hijab as a potential threat to public order and such actions are likely to reinforce harmful stereotypes and stigmatise Muslim women and girls.

“In a context of intolerance and strong stigmatisation of women and girls who choose to wear the hijab, France must take all measures at its disposal to protect them, to safeguard their rights, and to promote equality and mutual respect for cultural diversity,” they concluded.

The human rights experts have formally communicated with the Government of France about this situation, which was also raised in the report presented at the UN General Assembly by the UN Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.