October 06, 2026 08:33 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Crash axe’ blow fractured Smit Machchhar’s skull: Shocking details emerge from flydubai cockpit horror | ‘Vote thief’ Gyanesh Kumar: Rahul Gandhi climbs barricade, waves Tricolour during explosive INDIA bloc protest | ‘Crash axe’ blow fractured Smit Machchhar’s skull: Shocking details emerge from flydubai cockpit horror | ‘He should not have been flying’: JD Vance on Flydubai co-pilot | Israel was ready to shoot down Flydubai jet if it kept flying towards Tel Aviv: Reports | 'If law wasn't followed, we can undo it': Supreme Court's big warning on SIR process amid Gyanesh Kumar row | From TMC Rajya Sabha MP to BJP nominee in 6 months: Koel Mallick's stunning political U-turn | ‘Stomp on your head’: Omani flydubai co-pilot’s chilling posts on violence against women surface | Asian Games 2026: India beat Pakistan to clinch gold in men's cricket | flydubai cockpit attack: Deleted posts expose Omani co-pilot’s views on women, alleged extremist past
Kirpan

Australian Court overturns ban on Sikh students’ Kirpan, cites unconstitutionality

| @indiablooms | Aug 07, 2023, at 04:15 am

In a significant victory for religious freedom, Australia’s Queensland state has witnessed the overturning of a controversial law that prohibited Sikh students from wearing a kirpan on campus.

The ruling, which deemed the legislation “unconstitutional,” marks a pivotal moment for the Sikh community and their right to practice their faith without discrimination.

The landmark decision came after Kamaljit Kaur Athwal courageously challenged the state government in court last year, arguing that the ban on the kirpan, one of the five religious symbols integral to the Sikh faith, was discriminatory and hindered their religious practices.

The Queensland Supreme Court, on Thursday, ruled in favor of Kamaljit Kaur Athwal and the Sikh community, stating that “the ban is unconstitutional under the Racial Discrimination Act,” as reported by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

Initially, the claim that the ban was discriminatory was dismissed in an earlier court ruling, but a subsequent appeal has now delivered a resounding win for the Sikh faith.

Bill Potts, representing Potts Lawyers in Queensland, underscored the gravity of the original legislation, which effectively restricted Sikhs from attending schools and practicing their religion freely. With the ban now struck down, Sikhs are granted the same freedoms as everyone else, free from discrimination imposed by state laws.

The decision has been celebrated by the Sikh community as a crucial step forward in upholding their religious rights and cultural identity. Bill Potts emphasized that the overturning of the law restores the essential freedom of practicing their faith without undue hindrance.

“This just simply means that they have the same freedom that everybody else has and are not discriminated against by the state legislation,” he stated.

The ruling sets an essential precedent for safeguarding religious freedom in Australia and sends a strong message about the importance of accommodating diverse religious practices within the country’s educational institutions and society at large.

As Australia takes strides towards fostering a more inclusive and tolerant society, this court ruling serves as a beacon of hope for religious communities seeking to uphold their beliefs while being respected and embraced by the broader community.

(Image and text courtesy: Khalsavox.com)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.