August 27, 2026 05:14 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Kanpur plane crash: Training aircraft crashes near Ganges, two pilots killed | Big IT boost for Bengal: LTM opens global delivery & AI centre in Kolkata's New Town | 21-year-old Delhi model found stabbed at Delhi home, gym trainer accused of killing her | ‘Who is stopping her from wearing what she wants?’: Kangana Ranaut hits back at Kriti Sanon over Raksha Bandhan ad | 300 Indians missing in Nepal flash floods, 160 dead: Foreign Minister reveals grim toll | Supreme Court directs Tarun Tejpal to surrender within two weeks | Supreme Court notice to 20 rebel TMC MPs in disqualification plea | ‘Reservation for poor, not caste’: Stir at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar | Dalit woman 'gangrape-murder' shocker in Karnataka: 4 arrested after body found in well | India dismisses Pakistan's 'frustration' over US envoy's J&K remark

50 persons of a single family not listed in Assam NRC

| @indiablooms | Sep 01, 2019, at 06:29 pm

Guwahati, Sept 1 (IBNS): Not only one, two, three or five, a total of 50 persons of a single family have been excluded from the final National Register of Citizens (NRC), which was published on Aug 31.

The list excluded 19 lakh people.

A 52-year-old Ahmad Hussain,  a primary school teacher and his entire family members, including at least 15 children, were left out from the final NRC list.

Ahmad Hussain and his family members, including 7 brothers, are living at Nichanchar village under Baghbor assembly constituency in Assam’s Barpeta district.

Interestingly, the entire family, excluding a brother of Ahmad Hussain, was included in the earlier draft NRC list, but they were left out from the final NRC.

The excluded person from the earlier draft NRC was Abdul Baten – one brother of Ahmad Hussain.

When the NRC authority served hearing notice to Abdul Baten, he had used 1966 legacy data of late Harmuj Ali Bhuyan.

Ahmad Hussain doubted that the difference of the legacy data of 1951 and 1966 is the main reason for it.

The entire family is now worried after their names were not listed in the final NRC list.

“We have found that, not a single member of our family listed in the final NRC which was published yesterday. There are 50 members in our family. We had used our father’s legacy data of 1951. Our family members name were listed in the earlier draft NRC, but one of brother’s name was not included. When he applied second time, he used 1966 legacy data. For it, we were served several notices. We had appeared in hearings four times. But our names were not listed in the final NRC. We are now frustrated. We are worried about it. We will apply again following the government instructions,” Ahmad Hussain said.

 

(By Hemanta Kumar Nath, Guwahati)

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.