Ayodhya title issue: Muslim side in apex court picks holes in Nirmohi Akhara stance
New Delhi, Sep 3 (UNI) One of the Muslim parties in the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute on Tuesday submitted to the Supreme Court's five-judge Constitution bench that the stand of the other side, Nirmohi Akhara, has always been contradictory from the very beginning of the case.
"The stand of the Nirmohi Akhara (One of the parties in the Ayodhya title suit) is always contradictory. It says at times, the disputed site is from 300 years, at times 200 years or more than 150 years," Dr Rajeev Dhavan, senior lawyer appearing for the Muslim side, told the bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi.
A new flourish is added to pleadings of Hindu parties that the persons who brought down the mosque were miscreants and had nothing to do with the Hindus, Dhavan submitted.
Up for consideration are a batch of appeals against the 2010 Allahabad High Court trifurcation of the 2.77 acres disputed site at Ayodhya.
Image: UNI
Support Our Journalism
We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism
IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.
Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
