May 18, 2026 05:20 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Kathak to Garba: Indian diaspora stuns PM Modi with grand welcome in Amsterdam | ‘Geography or history’: Indian Army chief issues blunt warning to Pakistan over terror support | India, UAE ink key energy deals during Modi’s visit amid West Asia tensions | ‘There can be no better Bengal CM’: Mithun Chakraborty praises Suvendu Adhikari | PM Modi adviser Sanjeev Sanyal frontrunner for Bengal Finance Minister: Report | FIR against Abhishek Banerjee over ‘provocative speeches’ during West Bengal poll campaign | Madhya Pradesh High Court holds Bhojshala complex disputed site to be a temple | ‘Even ex-CM can be probed’: Suvendu Adhikari’s big statement on RG Kar case | Big action in RG Kar case: Bengal CM Suvendu Adhikari suspends 3 IPS officers, including ex-CP Vineet Goyal | Modi’s UAE visit delivers major defence, energy deals amid Middle East tensions

Error in evaluation of CBSE Class 12 results?

| | Jun 18, 2017, at 05:45 pm
New Delhi, June 18 (IBNS): The controversy related to the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) Class 12 results refuses to cease with new reports revealing huge discrepancies in marks of candidates appeared.

According to The Times of India, it all started when Sonali, a Delhi student, who was shocked to see that she has just scored 68 in mathematics in her Class XII exam while 99 in economics, 95 in accountancy and 96 in business studies.

Another student named  Samiksha Sharma scored 42 in maths, while her scores in English, Business Studies and Fine Arts were pretty good.

When these two students applied for verification, Sonali's 68 was increased to 95 while that of Samiksha's doubled more than over to 90.

Reports said that, a CBSE student needs a court order to apply for a re-evaluation.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.