August 27, 2026 05:47 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Kanpur plane crash: Training aircraft crashes near Ganges, two pilots killed | Big IT boost for Bengal: LTM opens global delivery & AI centre in Kolkata's New Town | 21-year-old Delhi model found stabbed at Delhi home, gym trainer accused of killing her | ‘Who is stopping her from wearing what she wants?’: Kangana Ranaut hits back at Kriti Sanon over Raksha Bandhan ad | 300 Indians missing in Nepal flash floods, 160 dead: Foreign Minister reveals grim toll | Supreme Court directs Tarun Tejpal to surrender within two weeks | Supreme Court notice to 20 rebel TMC MPs in disqualification plea | ‘Reservation for poor, not caste’: Stir at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar | Dalit woman 'gangrape-murder' shocker in Karnataka: 4 arrested after body found in well | India dismisses Pakistan's 'frustration' over US envoy's J&K remark

Have not supported the communication blockade in valley: PCI chairman

| @indiablooms | Aug 28, 2019, at 09:05 pm

New Delhi, Aug 28 (UNI): Press Council of India on Wednesday refuted the comments made by noted journalist N Ram that the council was supporting the communication curbs in Jammu and Kashmir.

In a letter to N Ram, council chairman Justice Chandramauli Kumar Prasad, referring to a news report published in an English daily on Wednesday that had a heading that 'PCI backing J and K curbs undemocratic: N Ram’, said that in his intervention application in the Supreme court, he had not supported the communication blockade.

"From a plain reading of the intervention application filed by the council in the Supreme court, it is evident that I have not supported the communication blockade," he said.

I will advise you to read the intervention application which is available on the website and point out a single sentence or a single word where I have “supported the communication blockade in the valley. I challenge, you will not find anything like that,’’ Justice Prasad said in his letter.

He said that the very premise of the news report was falsehood.

"According to the news report, you have allegedly stated that it was shocking that the PCI-that is supposed to protect the freedom of the press, independence of the press, freedom of journalists- had taken a position supporting the communication blockade in the valley."

"The very premise on which you have build this superstructure, mildly speaking, is a blatant lie. I am sure you have not read the ‘intervention application, filed by the council before the Supreme Court but greatly swayed by distorted media reports,’’ Justice Prasad said.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.