September 04, 2026 11:43 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR row: ‘No power to take action against law students’ | ‘Technical error, not U-turn’: Kerala CM Satheesan denies deleting video slamming cleric’s women remarks after Islamic Scholars’ meet | Bombay HC orders CBI probe into Sushant Singh Rajput's ex-manager Disha Salian's death case | Vijay for PM in 2029? TVK says Rahul Gandhi will ‘hold his hand’ to make him Prime Minister | CJP calls off Sept 5 Delhi march after Supreme Court quashes FIRs against protesters | ‘Dismantle entire terror ecosystem’: Modi’s strong message at SCO Summit in Shehbaz’s presence | Modi’s big appeal after 7.8% GDP growth: ‘Don’t travel abroad, avoid destination weddings’ | Modi-Pezeshkian talks: Iran seeks India’s 'extensive contacts' to end West Asia war | Indus Waters Treaty row: India rejects Hague court order, says ‘no jurisdiction’ over its sovereign decisions | India beats the odds with 7.8% GDP growth; PM Modi has a message for critics

India awaits Supreme Court verdict on gay sex as judges set to rule on Section 377 today

| @indiablooms | Sep 06, 2018, at 10:23 am

New Delhi, Sept 6 (IBNS): The Supreme Court is likely to pronounce its verdict today on whether homosexuality will continue to remain a crime in India with the top court set to rule on the validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra will deliver its verdict on whether Section 377 that holds gay sex as an offence in India will remain or not. In 2013, the top court had upheld gay-sex as an offence though this section was read down by the Delhi High Court in July 2009 in response to a Naz Foundation petition in the Delhi high court against Section 377.

That judgement was overturned by the Supreme Court on 11 December 2013  holding that amending or repealing section 377 should be a matter left to Parliament, not the judiciary.

Besides Chief Justice Dipak Misra the bench comprises judges R.F. Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y.Chandrachud, and Indu Malhotra.

In Aug 2017, the Supreme Court had held Right to Privacy as a fundamental right. It also ruled that sexual orientation is an "essential component of identity". In July this year, the apex court began hearing petitions challenging Section 377 wth indications that it might be repealed.

Chapter XVI, Section 377 of the IPC dates back to 1860 introduced during the British rule of India, and it criminalises sexual activities "against the order of nature", arguably including homosexual acts.

According to it, Unnatural offences means: "Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine."

The Delhi High Court verdict of July 2009 was not challenged by the Government of India. Since then it was like a law in India. But the SC verdict of 2013 changed all that and gay sex again became illegal in India.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.