April 16, 2026 02:14 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘We are surprised’: SC stays Pawan Khera’s bail over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife | Historic shift: Bihar gets first BJP CM as Samrat Choudhary takes oath | 'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping | I don’t care if they come back or not, says Trump after Iran talks collapse | Legendary singer Asha Bhosle suffers cardiac arrest, hospitalised | Big boost to India–Mauritius ties: S. Jaishankar hands over 90 e-buses | Middle East tension: Iranian delegation arrives in Islamabad for major talks, 10,000 security personnel deployed | Ranveer Singh visits RSS HQ amid Dhurandhar 2 success, triggers speculation
Mallikarjun Kharge said the government was attempting to “gag and suppress” dissent. Photo: Official Facebook.

Opposition vows to fight Women's Quota Bill over ‘politicised’ delimitation plan

| @indiablooms | Apr 15, 2026, at 09:03 pm

The Congress and several Opposition parties on Tuesday said they support the Women’s Reservation Bill in principle but will oppose the government’s approach to implementing it through delimitation, calling the move politically motivated.

Addressing a joint press conference after a meeting of Opposition leaders, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said the government was attempting to “gag and suppress” dissent.

“We are in support of the Women’s Reservation Bill, but we object to the government’s approach. The action is politically motivated,” Kharge said, adding that the Opposition would fight the proposal in Parliament.

The remarks come ahead of an extended Budget session starting April 16, where the Centre is expected to table a set of bills, including constitutional amendments tied to the quota’s implementation.

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh alleged that the Delimitation Commission was being used as a political tool. “Women’s reservation should be implemented, but we are totally against delimitation,” he said.

Rahul Gandhi's message

Echoing the concern, Rahul Gandhi accused the government of attempting a “power grab” through gerrymandering.

In a post on X, he warned that the move could undermine representation for OBCs, Dalits, Adivasis, and states in southern and northeastern India.

Numbers complicate passage

While the Women’s Reservation Bill itself enjoys broad support, related constitutional amendments require a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament.

The ruling NDA currently falls short of this threshold in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, making Opposition backing crucial.

Delimitation at the core of dispute

At the heart of the row is the proposed Delimitation Bill, which seeks to redraw constituencies based on the 2011 Census and increase Lok Sabha seats from 543 to as many as 850 to operationalise the quota before the 2029 general elections.

Opposition parties argue that this formula would disproportionately benefit northern states with higher population growth, reducing the parliamentary share of southern states that have controlled population growth more effectively.

Leaders from regional parties have also voiced concern. Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah warned that past delimitation exercises appeared to favour the BJP, while DMK MP Kanimozhi said the move could “badly affect” southern states.

Even parties that have previously supported the government, such as the BJD led by Naveen Patnaik, have adopted a cautious stance, indicating support would depend on safeguarding their state’s political representation.

Broad opposition unity

The Opposition meeting saw participation from leaders across parties, including DMK, RJD, Trinamool Congress, Shiv Sena (UBT), NCP (SP), Left parties, and others, signalling a coordinated strategy to challenge the bills in Parliament.

With numbers stacked against the government for constitutional amendments, the outcome is likely to hinge on negotiations—and whether consensus can be built around the contentious delimitation framework.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.