August 15, 2026 10:12 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe | From guns to glamour: Former women Maoists walk the ramp in Chhattisgarh | Netaji row: Suvendu Adhikari govt strips BJP MP Anant Maharaj of state honour | Sukhbir Badal attacked by Nihang Sikh with kirpan at Maharashtra gurdwara; assailant detained | ‘If you cannot do it, we will pass an order’: Supreme Court’s final warning to Centre on food labels | ‘Time to move on’: Bombay HC sends strong message in Vijay Mallya-bank dispute
Mallikarjun Kharge said the government was attempting to “gag and suppress” dissent. Photo: Official Facebook.

Opposition vows to fight Women's Quota Bill over ‘politicised’ delimitation plan

| @indiablooms | Apr 15, 2026, at 09:03 pm

The Congress and several Opposition parties on Tuesday said they support the Women’s Reservation Bill in principle but will oppose the government’s approach to implementing it through delimitation, calling the move politically motivated.

Addressing a joint press conference after a meeting of Opposition leaders, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said the government was attempting to “gag and suppress” dissent.

“We are in support of the Women’s Reservation Bill, but we object to the government’s approach. The action is politically motivated,” Kharge said, adding that the Opposition would fight the proposal in Parliament.

The remarks come ahead of an extended Budget session starting April 16, where the Centre is expected to table a set of bills, including constitutional amendments tied to the quota’s implementation.

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh alleged that the Delimitation Commission was being used as a political tool. “Women’s reservation should be implemented, but we are totally against delimitation,” he said.

Rahul Gandhi's message

Echoing the concern, Rahul Gandhi accused the government of attempting a “power grab” through gerrymandering.

In a post on X, he warned that the move could undermine representation for OBCs, Dalits, Adivasis, and states in southern and northeastern India.

Numbers complicate passage

While the Women’s Reservation Bill itself enjoys broad support, related constitutional amendments require a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament.

The ruling NDA currently falls short of this threshold in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, making Opposition backing crucial.

Delimitation at the core of dispute

At the heart of the row is the proposed Delimitation Bill, which seeks to redraw constituencies based on the 2011 Census and increase Lok Sabha seats from 543 to as many as 850 to operationalise the quota before the 2029 general elections.

Opposition parties argue that this formula would disproportionately benefit northern states with higher population growth, reducing the parliamentary share of southern states that have controlled population growth more effectively.

Leaders from regional parties have also voiced concern. Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah warned that past delimitation exercises appeared to favour the BJP, while DMK MP Kanimozhi said the move could “badly affect” southern states.

Even parties that have previously supported the government, such as the BJD led by Naveen Patnaik, have adopted a cautious stance, indicating support would depend on safeguarding their state’s political representation.

Broad opposition unity

The Opposition meeting saw participation from leaders across parties, including DMK, RJD, Trinamool Congress, Shiv Sena (UBT), NCP (SP), Left parties, and others, signalling a coordinated strategy to challenge the bills in Parliament.

With numbers stacked against the government for constitutional amendments, the outcome is likely to hinge on negotiations—and whether consensus can be built around the contentious delimitation framework.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.