December 19, 2025 03:19 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Worst is over,’ says IndiGo CEO after flight chaos; staff told to ignore speculation | Chaos at Hyderabad's Lulu Mall! Nidhhi Agerwal swarmed by fans, police register case | TCS bets big on AI, shares spike as company reveals ambitious plan | Delhi goes into emergency mode! Work from home, vehicle bans as AQI hits ‘severe’ | Massive fire guts shanties near Eco Park in Kolkata; no casualties | Indian Visa Application Centre in Dhaka shuts down early amid rising security concerns | Market update: Sensex tumbles 120 points, Nifty below 25,850 at closing bell | ‘Won’t apologise’: Prithviraj Chavan stands firm on controversial Operation Sindoor remark despite backlash | India summons Bangladesh High Commissioner after provocative 'seven sisters' remark | Amazon eyes $10 billion investment in OpenAI — a gamechanger for AI industry!
Hong Kong
45 activists sentenced in Hong Kong under National Security Law. Photo Courtesy: Unsplash

Forty-five activists sentenced in Hong Kong under controversial National Security Law

| @indiablooms | Nov 20, 2024, at 02:42 pm

The Human Rights Office (OHCHR) has expressed grave concern over the sentencing of 45 opposition activists in Hong Kong to up to 10 years in prison under China’s National Security Law, highlighting the potential erosion of fundamental freedoms in the region.

Spokesperson for the UN human rights office Jeremy Laurence condemned the use of the National Security Law to criminalise activities which are protected under international human rights law, including freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and association.

Most of the defendants who were sentenced on Tuesday were opposition politicians, academics and lawmakers charged in 2021 with conspiracy to commit subversion for taking part in an unofficial primary to select opposition candidates in July 2020.

‘Misuse’ of the law

Enacted in July 2020, the National Security Law introduced severe penalties for offences described as subversion, secession, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces.

Volker Türk, the High Commissioner for Human Rights, has expressed concern over the broad and vague provisions which could be “arbitrarily applied to curb freedom of expression and target dissenting voices.”

Since its implementation, over 100 individuals have been arrested, including prominent pro-democracy figures like media entrepreneur Jimmy Lai, who faces life imprisonment if convicted under the law.

In January, Special Rapporteur on Torture Alice Edwards expressed concerns about reports of torture being used to extract evidence against defendants.

Türk has also criticised recent expansion of the National Security Law, including a March 2024 ordinance adding new categories of offences, such as treason and sabotage.

These expansions, Türk noted, increase the law’s potential for “misuse” and further suppression of opposition.

Beyond the large numbers of accused directly impacted by criminal proceedings, these laws have had major chilling effects on others in the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong.

Call for repeal

The High Commissioner has called for an urgent review of the convictions and for Hong Kong authorities to ensure compliance with international obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

“Any national security legislation must remain clear in scope and definition, and only permit restrictions to human rights that are strictly necessary for a legitimate purpose, and proportionate”, the OHCHR emphasised.

Türk has urged the immediate suspension of the law’s application and its eventual repeal, stressing the importance of safeguarding human rights and democratic freedoms in Hong Kong.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.