August 16, 2026 04:55 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After SC rebuke, BCI chief apologises to NALSAR students over enrolment freeze row | Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe
Protest rally against Waqf Act turns violent in Bengal's Murshidabad. photo courtesy: Videograb from X/Amit Malviya

Protest against Waqf Act turns violent in Bengal's Murshidabad; cars torched, stones hurled amid clash with police

| @indiablooms | Apr 08, 2025, at 10:25 pm

Kolkata/IBNS: A protest rally in West Bengal's Murshidabad against the contentious Waqf Act turned violent on Tuesday when a clash broke out between the protesters and police, media reports said.

The situation escalated after police intervened to prevent the protesters from blocking a key road in the area.

Several vehicles were torched, and stones were thrown as chaos erupted in the region.

The protesters also vandalised a police vehicle.

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, was passed by both Houses of Parliament last week after marathon debates. The Bill became an Act after it received the assent of President Droupadi Murmu on Saturday.

The Act came into effect on Tuesday, April 8.

BJP leader Amit Malviya slammed the Mamata Banerjee-led government for the clashes in Murshidabad.

"The West Bengal Police is struggling to rein in the violent Islamist mob rampaging through the streets of Murshidabad—possibly under instructions from Home Minister Mamata Banerjee herself. Her inflammatory speeches have directly contributed to the current unrest," he said.

He claimed that internet services in the Jangipur area were "throttled to restrict the flow of information".

"This is the same region that witnessed repeated attacks on Hindus during the recent Kartik Puja celebrations. Several trains were brought to a standstill as tensions escalated," Amit Malviya said.

"Mamata Banerjee’s politics of appeasement will be swept away by the rising tide of Hindu awakening in Bengal," he said.

Supreme Court to hear petitions against Waqf Act on April 16

The Supreme Court will hear a batch of petitions filed against the Waqf Law, which has already come into force, on April 16, media reports said.

However, the government has filed a caveat in the top court, which states that no orders should be passed without hearing its perspective.

So far, 15 petitions have been filed on the contentious bill, which was passed by the Parliament last week.

The bill has faced multiple reservations from the Opposition, and sections of the Muslim community have raised objections on several amendments.

Most of these reservations were raised during the marathon 12-plus hour debate on the bill in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on Wednesday and Thursday last week.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.