August 16, 2026 05:21 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After SC rebuke, BCI chief apologises to NALSAR students over enrolment freeze row | Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe
SP MP Ramji Lal Suman referred to 16th century Rajput warrior king Ranga Sanga as 'traitor'. (Image credit: wikipedia.org/ video grab)

Samajwadi Party MP’s ‘traitor’ remark on Rajput king Rana Sanga sparks BJP backlash in Parliament

| @indiablooms | Mar 22, 2025, at 08:03 pm

New Delhi: Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Ramji Lal Suman's comments on Rajput king Rana Sanga in Parliament have ignited a political storm, drawing fierce criticism from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), media reports said.

During a discussion on the Home Ministry, Suman referred to the 16th-century ruler as a "traitor," leading to widespread outrage, India Today reported.

Suman made the remark while countering BJP's claims about the ancestry of Indian Muslims.

"BJP leaders often claim that Muslims have the DNA of Babur. But Indian Muslims do not consider Babur their ideal. In fact, who brought Babur to India? It was Rana Sanga who invited him to defeat Ibrahim Lodi. By that logic, if you claim Muslims are the descendants of Babur, then you are also the descendants of Rana Sanga—a traitor. We criticise Babur, but not Rana Sanga," he said, according to the India Today report.

His statement triggered a sharp response from BJP leaders, who condemned it as an insult to the Rajput community.

Former BJP MP Sanjeev Balyan lashed out on social media, calling the remark "a grave insult to Rajputs and the entire Hindu society."

Sharing a video clip of Suman's speech, he demanded an apology from the Samajwadi Party.

BJP MP Manoj Tiwari linked Suman's remarks to what he described as an attempt to glorify controversial historical figures.

"Some people are trying to make Aurangzeb a hero. Such people should be identified. He was an enemy of the country. We have never said that Muslims are the descendants of Babur. The Muslims of this country are ours," he said, according to the report.

Meanwhile, BJP MP PP Chaudhary called the comments "unacceptable" and an insult to history.

"The Samajwadi Party MP's remark about Mewar's brave warrior in Parliament is highly condemnable and unacceptable," he said.

Who was Rana Sanga?

Rana Sanga, a Rajput king from the Sisodia dynasty, ruled Mewar from 1508 to 1528 and played a key role in uniting Rajput clans against the expanding Delhi Sultanate.

His reign extended across Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Madhya Pradesh, with Chittor as his capital. Babur, a descendant of Genghis Khan and Timur, invaded India in 1526, defeating Ibrahim Lodi in the First Battle of Panipat to establish the Mughal Empire.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.