May 15, 2026 11:33 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds Bhojshala complex disputed site to be a temple | ‘Even ex-CM can be probed’: Suvendu Adhikari’s big statement on RG Kar case | Big action in RG Kar case: Bengal CM Suvendu Adhikari suspends 3 IPS officers, including ex-CP Vineet Goyal | Modi’s UAE visit delivers major defence, energy deals amid Middle East tensions | BRICS sideline: Jaishankar holds crucial talks with Iran as West Asia tensions | Suvendu Adhikari resigns as Nandigram MLA, keeps Bhabanipur seat | Modi’s UAE visit delivers major defence, energy deals amid Middle East tensions | NEET (UG) 2026 re-exam scheduled for June 21 amid massive 'paper leak' row | ECI announces third phase of SIR; Himachal, J&K, Ladakh excluded for now | Storm fury in Uttar Pradesh: Death toll rises to 89 as rain, gale-force winds leave trail of destruction
Tamil Nadu
(From L to R) Tamil Nadu CM MK Stalin, Supreme Court and Governor RN Ravi. Photo courtesy: MK Stalin X handle, Wikipedia

Tamil Nadu Guv withholding assent to 10 key bills 'illegal' and 'arbitrary': Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Apr 08, 2025, at 02:06 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: In a landmark judgement in favour of the Stalin government, the Supreme Court on Tuesday said Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi's decision to withhold his assent to 10 key bills was "illegal" and "arbitrary", media reports said. 

The top court said it is illegal for the Governor to reserve bills for the President after withholding assent.

A Supreme Court bench comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan said as quoted by NDTV, "The action of the Governor to reserve the 10 bills for the President is illegal and arbitrary. Thus, the action is set aside.

"All actions taken by the Governor thereto for the 10 bills are set aside. These Bills shall be deemed to be cleared from the date it was re-presented to the Governor."

The court said the Governor should have given his assent to the bill when it was re-presented to him by the assembly.

Citing the Constitution, the court said the Governor can give his assent, withhold assent or reserve the bill for President's consideration.

The Governor can send back the bill to the House or Houses for a reconsideration of some of its provisions but if the assembly re-sends the bill, the Constitutional head will have no choice but to give his assent.

The Governor can reserve the bill for the President's consideration if he finds it is contradictory to the Constitution, directive principles of state policy or matters of national importance.

The court said in this case the Governor should not have withheld the bill.

Welcoming the judgement, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and DMK chief, MK Stalin, posted on X, "We thank and welcome today’s historic judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, reaffirming the legislative rights of State Legislatures and putting an end to the trend of Union government-nominated Governors stalling progressive legislative reforms in Opposition-ruled states.

"This is another crucial step in restoring balance in Union–State relations and a landmark victory in Tamil Nadu’s continuous struggle to usher in a truly federal India. My congratulations to the people of Tamil Nadu and our legal team!"

The ruling DMK has been accusing RN Ravi, a former IPS officer, of blocking bills and acting as the representative of the country's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) after assuming the post.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.